MAY LOVE PREVAIL ON EARTH


June 25, 2004

Miscellaneous Subjects #206: Taking Care of Business


Hello everyone

Here is what got my attention this week - amidst lots of other summer activities of course ;-)

Please note that there will be a new Meditation Focus issued late Saturday night (my time).

Have a great weekend!

Jean Hudon
Earth Rainbow Network Coordinator

Free subscription to such compilations by sending a blank email to earthrainbownetwork-subscribe@lists.riseup.net

This compilation is archived at http://www.earthrainbownetwork.com/Archives2004/MiscelSubjects206.htm


"The government, which was designed for the people, has got into the hands of the bosses and their employers, the special interests. An invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy."

- Woodrow T. Wilson : 28th president of the United States 1856-1924


"The corporate grip on opinion in the United States is one of the wonders of the Western world. No First World country has ever managed to eliminate so entirely from its media all objectivity - much less dissent. Of course, it is possible for any citizen with time to spare, and a canny eye,to work out what is actually going on, but for the many there is not time,and the network news is the only news even though it may not be news at all but only a series of flashing fictions..."

- Gore Vidal


"Following the same course that virtually every other major industry has in the last two decades, a relentless series of mergers and corporate takeovers has consolidated control of the media into the hands of a few corporate behemoths. The result has been that an increasingly authoritarian agenda has been sold to the American people by a massive, multi-tentacled media machine that has become, for all intents and purposes, a propaganda organ of the state."

-David McGowan

All 3 quotes above taken from the June 24 GlobalNetNews-Summary - To subscribe sent a blank email to GlobalNetNews-Summary-subscribe@yahoogroups.com> or check the archives at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/globalnetnews-summary/

Here is what was included in the June 24 GlobalNetNews-Summary available at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GlobalNetNews-Summary/message/353

1 Nation's Largest Union Calls for End to U.S. Occupation of Iraq and Withdrawal of U.S. Troops
2 Prisoner abuse: US backs down over immunity for soldiers
3 Sudan: 'We don't want food. All we want is to go back home'
4 Iraq: 70 Killed And 250 Wounded:
5 A remarkable Jewish Israeli woman speaks out
6 Afghanistan: 7 US troops Killed in Khost Ambush
7 Iraq Trust Gap: You've got a credibility problem, Mr. President:
8 Techniques 'amount to torture'
9 Reviewing The Lies: President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat:
10 Bush To Push NATO To Send Force To Iraq
11 Ha'aretz Updates Wednesday, June 23, 2004
12 Iraq's Sovereign‚ Government to Have Little Control Over Oil Money
13 Sex Bias at Wal-Mart: Court Allows Class-Action Suit
14 Iraq prison scandal dooms US bid for war crimes immunity:
15 The Economic Colonization of Iraq: Illegal and Immoral
16 House Endorses Bush's Position on Israel
17 Israelization of America
18 Kerry's Budgetary Catch-22, by Robert Kuttner
19 Bush's Credibility Gap Widens, by Helen Thomas (COMPLETE)


Worthy of Your Attention

Lots of news at http://omega.twoday.net and at http://www.lovearth.net/news.php

University staff assists gaggle
http://www.queensu.ca/security/graphics/2004/int-0405-02.html


CONTENTS

1. Feedback on The Arisen Phoenix Series #5: Mystical Union Becoming More Common
2. Moore’s Magic: 9/11 Electrifies
3. Texas State Democratic Party has included in its platform the Department of Peace
4. Dr. Fox was in prison for giving illegal drugs
5. Canadian elections - Grading the Parties On Defence
6. The Truth on Harper & His Conservative Party
7. Will The Commissioners Cave?
8. Starting in June 2005, the draft is coming back
9. A New Role for Governance


See also:

Thousands in Ireland protest Bush visit (June 25)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apeurope_story.asp?category=1103&slug=Ireland%20BushSeattle
DUBLIN, Ireland -- Thousands of left-wing activists marched through the Irish capital Friday to protest the arrival of President Bush for a brief summit with European Union chiefs. Rallying under the "Stop Bush Campaign" banner, the crowd of about 10,000 waved signs denouncing Bush as a warmonger and calling for an end to American military flights though Shannon Airport, a strategic refueling point used by thousands of U.S. troops each month.The protesters marched from north Dublin to the south-side office of Prime Minister Bertie Ahern, whose decision to keep Shannon available for Iraq-bound forces has angered many in this officially neutral nation."Good people of America," read one placard, "vote that son of a Bush out." "If we don't speak out, our silence will be taken as consent," Dublin Mayor Andrew Montague told the crowd. "This president lied to the world about the reasons for invading Iraq." CLIP

Irish create a 'ring of steel' for Bush visit (June 25)
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=732492004
George Bush’s visit to the Irish Republic has prompted an unprecedented £2.1m security operation GEORGE Bush flew into Ireland last night for talks with European leaders amid the biggest security operation in the history of the state. As the United States president and his wife, Laura, waved from the steps of Air Force One, the public and anti-war protesters were kept well away from the remote runway at Shannon Airport in County Clare. More than 2,000 troops and heavy armoured vehicles surrounded the airport’s perimeter fence and military helicopters patrolled overhead in an unprecedented operation. Hundreds of Gardai formed a line in front of 1,200 protesters, who marched from Shannon town centre to within 100 yards of the airport, in a protest which passed off peacefully. Mr Bush was due to remain in the Republic for just 18 hours, nevertheless his visit will cost the Irish government 3 million (£2.1 million). CLIP

President Bush Edges Kerry (June 25 - THIS IS FOX NEWS!)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,123760,00.html
A new FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll shows that — after being tied with John Kerry for the past four months — President Bush is now leading Kerry by 7 percentage points, when Ralph Nader's in the race. In addition, the poll shows President Bush — who was trailing Kerry in the 15 battleground states two weeks ago — now tied with Kerry, with President Bush beating Kerry in Florida, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania. CLIP

Green Follies (June 23, 2004)
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0623-01.htm
A shocking scenario is unfolding before our eyes which, if carried through, will constitute the greatest mistake made by the left in many years. A small but very determined fraction of the Green Party is prepared to package Ralph Nader with Peter Camejo, the Green Gubernatorial candidate in California in 2002 and Nader's just-announced Vice-Presidential choice, in a drive to capture the Green's "endorsement" (Nader is not eligible for the party's nomination) in the upcoming national convention this weekend in Milwaukee. Camejo's presence on the ticket undercuts the objection that Nader has no real connection to the party's base, and it touched off the internet equivalent of jubilation on the lists controlled by Greens of this persuasion. "Imagine hundreds of thousands of Greens hitting the streets all across the country energized by the strongest progressive ticket in a generation," waxed one such Naderite, omitting to ponder the fact that a strenuous petition campaign for Nader barely managed to clear 300 signatures among Greens. But in one of those flukes tossed up from time to time by history, it may actually turn out that a tiny coterie could squeeze an endorsement out of the convention . . . which could turn over the 22 state ballot lines controlled by the Greens to Nader/Camejo . . . which could result in toss-up states like Oregon, Wisconsin and New Mexico going over to the Republicans . . . which could give us four more years of you-know-who. Nader has been straining to argue that he will pull in as many disaffected Republican as Democratic votes. But the selection of a Vice-Presidential candidate demonstrably to his left puts the quietus to that dubious line of reasoning. The only practical "success" he can now have will be to bring W. back to the White House. (...) Nader seems incapable of grasping this qualitative distinction, and his loyal band of Greens goes along, caught up, for the third time, no less, in hero worship, and oblivious to the fact that the essential principle of Green politics is grassroots democracy. The Greens have a perfectly respectable candidate in David Cobb, who rose through the ranks. But because Cobb has shown some sensitivity to the extreme danger posed by another Bush administration, the Naderites attack him as a virtual agent of the Democratic Party as they fantasize about the great social movement Ralph Nader is going to unleash in America. A lose-lose situation looms. To the extent that Nader succeeds, so does Bush. And in any case, the left will emerge weaker and more divided from this Quixotic escapade. Once again the left has become its own worst enemy.

U.S. Considers Troop Increase in Iraq (23 June 2004)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5277276/
Army developing contingency plan to deploy 25,000 more troops WASHINGTON - U.S. Central Command has asked the Army to prepare for the possibility that an 25,000 more troops may be needed in Iraq if the security situation continues to deteriorate after the transfer of sovereignty next week, NBC News has learned.

Poll reveals hostility to US and support for rebel cleric (17 June 2004)
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=532337
The Bush administration's last remaining justification for the invasion of Iraq has been demolished by a private poll revealing that only 2 per cent of Iraqis regard the occupying forces as liberators.

The deepening darkness - By John Kaminski (June 23)
http://www.rense.com/general54/deepe.htm
U.S.-Israeli mercenaries pose as al-Qaeda, carry out staged beheadings - It's truly saddening — and frightening — to see so many people from the 9/11 truth movement and the nominally intelligent sectors of American society duped by the new government fairy tales that Americans Nick Berg and Paul Johnson and Korean Kim Sun-il were beheaded by al-Qaeda terrorists when in fact the perpetrators were international mercenaries who draw their paychecks from the subterranean murder bureau run by the United States Central Intelligence Agency, Israel's Mossad and the hired henchmen of morally bankrupt and Bush-connected Saudi Arabian royalty.Now that Ashcroft's fake terror alerts within the U.S. fail to draw even a ripple of attention — except for honest intelligence analysts who quickly debunk them as calculated fantasy — the forces of evil run by Dick Cheney and his Soviet-style hit men within the Bush administration have resorted to actual grisly performances of preposterous violence overseas in clumsy attempts to deflect attention from embarrassing news on the homefront and build a case for their incipient invasion of oil fields in eastern Saudi Arabia as their brutal rape of Iraq continues unabated.But as usual Americans are kept in the dark by their mindlocked mainstream media, surely more warped than the state-controlled Soviet press ever was, and are spoonfed magical tales of evil al-Qaeda deeds from newsrooms that have CIA censors coordinating their vomitous expectorations. CLIP

The predatory policies of the world's de facto government (June 22, 2004)
http://www3.sympatico.ca/sr.gowans/predatory.html
You don't have to look much further to see that Washington intends to act as a de facto world government than Bush administration lawyers arguing the president isn't bound by US or international laws that prohibit the use of torture. In this, and in other ways, it is understood that the president is free to act according to his own laws, defined by reference to national security interests, and senior to all others, including the UN Charter, the Nuremberg Laws, the Geneva Conventions and numerous other international treaties and protocols. There is much US public sympathy for the view that the president should do what is necessary to defend national security interests, even if what is necessary is harsh, and even illegal. But there is precious little understanding of what the term national security means. It seems to suggest security of the person against unprovoked aggression from abroad, but if so, one could be forgiven for scratching his head over how it is that the US has vital security interests in so many places, from Southeast Asia, to Africa, to Central Asia, to Latin America, to Europe, to...well, to everywhere. Are there really people in all these places plotting harm to US citizens out of malice? What national security interests are at stake in Iraq? CLIP

Unsettling signs (June 21, 2004)
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39063
For the last three months, contrarian economists have been looking at the Fed's wild and crazy increase of the M3 money supply, which has been jacked up by $1.4 trillion since January, and wondering what in the world is going on. It has led some to conclude that the Fed is aware of an imminent disaster approaching as the Fed usually only cranks the printing presses up to high after an event like 9-11 or the 1987 Long-Term Capital Management disaster. But what sort of event can you expect and plan for months in advance? Consider the other evidence. Last November, during a visit to Washington, Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz warned that Iran would reach a "point of no return" in its nuclear program within a year. On May 6, the House of Representatives passed a resolution to authorize pre-emptive military strikes against Iran, 376-3. On March 10, France, Germany and the U.K. "sharply criticized" Iran in a resolution presented to the United Nation's atomic agency, which is rather more than the cheese-eating surrender monkeys and the schnitzel-snarfing stormtrooper spawn were willing to do to Iraq. CLIP

Afghan Detainees Routinely Tortured and Humiliated by US Troops http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0623-03.htm

Report: Israel operating hundreds of agents in northern Iraq (June 22)
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=441208
WASHINGTON - Israel operates hundreds of agents in the Kurdish areas in northern Iraq, according to a report published in the upcoming issue of The New Yorker magazine. In an interview to CNN on Sunday, reporter Seymour Hersh said that hundreds of Israelis, some of them Mossad agents, are operating in the region in order to collect information on Iran's nuclear program and monitor events in Syria. According to the report, Israel in the past has had many ties with the Kurds, which with the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime are currently being renewed. Israel is not confident of the success of the American program for the stabilization of the country, the report says, and that is why it is interested in setting up independent connections in the region. Israelis operating in the region are also attempting to assist Kurds living in Syria, the report says.

Shell Oil Chief Admits Grave Fears For The Planet 'Confession' Shocks Industry (June 17)
http://www.rense.com/general53/shekle.htm
The Guardian - UK 6-17-4 The head of one of the world's biggest oil companies has admitted that the threat of climate change makes him "really very worried for the planet". In an interview in today's Guardian Life section, Ron Oxburgh, chairman of Shell, says we urgently need to capture emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, which scientists think contribute to global warming, and store them underground - a technique called carbon sequestration. "Sequestration is difficult, but if we don't have sequestration then I see very little hope for the world,"said Lord Oxburgh. "No one can be comfortable at the prospect of continuing to pump out the amounts of carbon dioxide that we are pumping out at present ... with consequences that we really can't predict but are probably not good." His comments will enrage many in the oil industry, which is targeted by climate change campaigners because the use of its products spews out huge quantities of carbon dioxide, most visibly from vehicle exhausts. His words follow those of the government's chief science adviser, David King, who said in January that climate change posed a bigger threat to the world than terrorism. CLIP

SUPERCOMPUTER FINDS CLIMATE LIKELY TO HEAT UP FAST (June 24, 2004)
http://www.climateark.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=32962
BOULDER, Colorado - A powerful new supercomputer climate modeling system at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) http://www.ncar.ucar.edu/ has found that global temperatures may rise more than previous projections if humans continue to emit large quantities of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. (...) CCSM3 is one of the world's leading general circulation climate models, sophisticated computer tools that incorporate phenomena ranging from the effect that volcanic eruptions have on temperature patterns to the impact of shifting sea ice on sunlight absorbed by the oceans. Climate models work by solving mathematical formulas, which represent the chemical and physical processes that drive Earth's climate, for thousands of points in the atmosphere, oceans, sea ice, and land surface.CCSM3 is so complex that it requires about three trillion computer calculations to simulate a single day of global climate, NCAR explains. CLIP

West's drought may be worst in 500 years (June 20)
http://tinyurl.com/3dgmh
Colorado River basin could see effects harsher than those of Dust Bowl - LAS VEGAS - The drought gripping the West could be the biggest in 500 years, with effects in the Colorado River basin considerably worse than during the Dust Bowl years, scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey said Thursday. "That we can now say with confidence," said Robert Webb, lead author of the new fact sheet. "Now I'm completely convinced." The Colorado River has been in a drought all of this decade, cutting an important source of water for millions of people across the West, including Southern California. Environmental groups said the report reinforces the need to figure out a better way to manage the Colorado River before reservoirs run dry. "The water managers, they just continue to pray for rain," said Owen Lammers, director of Living Rivers and Colorado River keeper. "They just say, well, we hope that things change and we see rain." CLIP

U.S. NOT READY FOR IMPENDING WATER CRISIS (June 21, 2004)
http://www.climateark.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=32831
WASHINGTON, DC, - The U.S. government is ill prepared to confront increasingly severe water shortages across the country and should make a new commitment to water research and governance, water experts warn in a new report. Water research is fragmented among 20 federal agencies and is poorly coordinated, according to a new study from the National Academies of Science sponsored by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The report comes on the heels of an announcement by USGS scientists Friday that the parched Interior West could be the driest it has been in 500 years. A decade of drought has produced the lowest flow on record in the 1,400 mile long Colorado River, which provides drinking water to Phoenix and Las Vegas. USGS scientists said Sunday that drought continues to affect a broad area of the West, from the Central Plains into the Northern Rockies, and has now moved into the Southeast.

RED TIDES AND DESERTIFICATION ALARM SCIENTISTS (June 21, 2004)
http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=1013BEIJING
Two red tides of algae have engulfed more than 5,000 sq km of the northeast sea, forming the largest toxic slick in history of Bohai sea, the area closest to Pechino, and threatening to contaminate important fishing waters.One tide started on Friday near the mouth of the Yellow River, the mainland's second longest, affecting an area of 1,850 sq km. The other tide started on Saturday in the middle, east and north of the Bohai Sea, affecting 3,200 sq km, the State Oceanic Administration said on Tuesday. "These red tides are a sort of biological cancer because they threaten environmental quality, aquatic life forms and even human life," said Zhao Zhangyuan, of the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences. The toxic slicks consist of a densely populated algae bloom that breeds in abundance, and consumes urban pollution, industrial discharge, farm waste and fertiliser run-off that flows into coastal waters from rivers and streams.Their large presence in the sea saps the water of oxygen while producing toxins that can paralyse fish and contaminate seafood. The administration urged authorities in Liaoning, Hebei, Tianjin and Shandong, which all lie along the Bohai coast, to monitor the algae and ensure all seafood was free of toxins before being sent to market. "Red tides are just one of the environmental problems the mainland is facing. It will lead to an unimaginable disaster if no clever action is taken quickly ... and the government has been slow to act," said Mr Zhao. Another urgent problem to solve is desertification. According to Xinhua, more than 1.7 million sq km -- 18.2 per cent of the mainland's land area -- is now classified as desert and the area is expanding at an alarming pace -- 3,464 sq km a year, compared with 2,460 sq km in 1994. CLIP




1.

Date: 23 Jun 2004
From: Patty-Lynne Herlevi pherlevi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: The Arisen Phoenix Series #5: Mystical Union Becoming More Common

Bonjour Jean,

The last compilation was fabulous. I especially was moved by the story by Lynn Smith. Yes, I think we are getting to the "promised land."

Incidentally, when I turned on the radio this morning, I heard an African-American New York City council member or (perhaps he's running for office) addressing a hip hop convention in Newark, New Jersey. And he told the people at the convention that we need to have a new system of voting in the U.S. One in which we do not vote out of fear or vote for the lesser of two evils. He said that there should be a third category, none of the above and if most of the votes go to none of the above, then we need to start the election process from scratch with new candidates. What a wonderful idea! Of course, he could have said, vote for Kucinich instead of Kerry or Bush.

Namaste,

Patty-Lynne




2.

Recommended by "Mark R. Elsis" mark@lovearth.net>

From: http://www.observer.com/pages/onthetown.asp

June 25, 2004

Moore’s Magic: 9/11 Electrifies

by Rex Reed

Michael Moore leaves no turn unstoned. There are multitudes of shattering, seminal moments in his brilliant Bush-whacking documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11, that reveal more about the cynicism, greed and ineptitude in the U.S. government than you will ever learn from any sound bite on the right-wing late-night cable-channel blabfests, but one will stay with me forever. Forget about the "official" reports from the White House about the activities of George W. Bush on the fateful morning of Sept. 11, insisting he learned about the Al Qaeda attacks while meeting with Florida pre-schoolers and quickly dashed from the room to save the country. The truth, it is now revealed, is that he was informed of the first attack on the World Trade Center before he even entered the schoolroom, and he decided to continue with his photo-op anyway. There he is on camera when Andrew Card informs him of the second plane and utters the fatal words, "We’re under attack!"—but he continues to read My Pet Goat for another seven minutes, his eyes sliding sideways in his puzzled face, like a moron looking for a bathroom, until his staff insists that he leave. (He stayed for another half hour.) If nothing else, that defining moment says volumes about what we can expect from the President of the U.S. in the center of a supreme, history-altering crisis: He’s just clueless.

There are other moments that will impact some viewers and polarize others. So many, in fact, that you watch Fahrenheit 9/11 with disbelief, and leave shaking with rage. Sometimes sarcastic, always funny, Mr. Moore is armed with facts, and he presents them accurately and succinctly. The controversial filmmaker stated on the Today show that White House mouthpieces have denounced the film as "outrageously false" without seeing it, and right-wing Republicans have charged Mr. Moore with staging a "left-wing conspiracy" to influence the forthcoming election. Well, duh. For years, reactionary conservatives have been famous for staging right-wing conspiracies of their own to disgrace and discredit elected Democratic public officials. Maybe this is payback time. Whatever it is, everyone should see Fahrenheit 9/11 first—before debating the issues. The purpose of any documentary is to influence opinion. But instead of the customarily droning voice that comments on the action and tells you what to think, this one asks tough, logical questions, gets rational answers, and never loses its entertainment value.

Mr. Moore, who has tackled corporate greed (Roger & Me) and gun control (Bowling for Columbine), now feels driven and obligated to strip the façade from a swaggering, bow-legged, grammatically challenged bully and a cabinet that is beginning to look more like the Third Reich every day. He accuses them of lying about their motivations for declaring war against Iraq, a country that never threatened America in the first place, killing thousands of innocent civilians in retaliation for the acts of 9/11 aggression, although not one of the terrorists was from Iraq, and killing more than 800 of our own American kids (all from ethnic or working-class families). Nobody denies that Saddam Hussein was a monster, but not the Iraqi women and children who have been "saved" from one villain only to be burned and shot and maimed for life without arms and legs by villains in a different uniform. At the same time, Mr. Moore shows Mr. Bush justifying American atrocities against Saddam Hussein by actually saying to the camera, "He tried to kill my daddy." Like his daddy, he knows he might also get kicked out of the White House after serving only one term. Still, he pursues a war that is losing the "hearts and minds" of even the boys who fight it (the interviews with our soldiers on the front lines will make you weep) while earning the U.S. unprecedented heights of global hatred and distrust, even from long-standing allies. And he does it on the golf course, ignoring the pressing domestic issues of health care, education, Social Security, unemployment and the economy while instructing frustrated reporters to watch his next drive. (In his first eight months in office, he was on vacation 42 percent of the time.) Meanwhile the current occupants of the White House, bolstered by an irresponsible press that has never bothered to ask the right questions, have courted public support by hammering home the kind of fear and born-again religious ideology that keep people subservient and paralyzed. Mr. Moore is saying that in the lineup of fear factors, terrorists and sinners may have replaced Communists and beatniks, but if you keep the people frightened enough, the bully always wins.

The movie begins with the awesome night in 2000 when the U. S. Supreme Court decided the election, not the American voters, then unveils footage that was never reported on TV of the Bush inauguration limousine being pelted with raw eggs. Instead of the traditional walk to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, he was so afraid to leave the car that he became the first President in history who was forced to sneak into the White House through a back door.

It was downhill from there, and Mr. Moore has obtained amazing film to illustrate the graphic two-hour slam-dunk that follows. In the wimpy reportage that has dominated the media for four years, very few journalists have bothered to investigate the shroud of secrecy surrounding the Bush Presidency that keeps the people ignorant, to write about it, to explain it. Mr. Moore does it with wit and cleverness. There’s no doubt that he would do anything to prevent a Bush re-election, but there is no conjecture here. No embellishment. He doesn’t need any. Dubya & Co. are easy targets: Mr. Moore simply turns on his cameras and lets them hang themselves. He proves the $1.5 billion in profits the Bush clan has made from oil interests of the family of Osama bin Laden, the real perpetrator of the 9/11 disaster, then asks why, when all aircraft were grounded after 9/11, the White House allowed several planes to fly around the country picking up the bin Laden family and protectively escorting 142 Saudis out of the country without interrogation, overruling the protests of the F.B.I. You can say, "Yes, but his family has denounced Osama, so what’s the problem?" The problem is that the Bushes, père et fils, were in business with his family at the same time that Osama was under surveillance as a suspected Al Qaeda terrorist and neglected to make a full disclosure.

Mr. Moore also reveals Dubya’s military records, blotting out the name of a fellow pilot whose flight status was suspended for refusing to take a physical exam. The friend Bush was trying to protect turns out to be James R. Bath, who both managed the U.S. financial investments of the bin Laden regime and bankrolled the various oil interests of the Bush brigade. Cut to Dubya, arrogantly stating: "Access is power." Then, when he was investigated by the S.E.C., the man who got Bush out of hot water, Robert W. Jordan, was later appointed ambassador to—you guessed it—Saudi Arabia. The ironies pile up like body bags.

Now that the merde has hit the oscillator, so to speak, Mr. Moore charges that the Bush administration is still trying to hide evidence of its own stupidity by censoring 28 pages of the independent report by the 9/11 commission. If you don’t gasp at the sight of Mr. Bush dining with the Saudi ambassador with part of the Pentagon in flames in the background, this movie is not for you. No need to talk about the President welcoming the Taliban to the State Department, knowing they were harboring the man who bombed the U.S.S. Cole. No need to go into the plans to build an underground pipeline through Afghanistan pumping money into a company owned by Vice President Dick Cheney. Alarmingly, it’s all gone unreported by an irresponsible press corps. With $860 billion currently invested by the Saudis in American business, no wonder our tax money pays for a six-man detail to protect the Saudi ambassador in Washington. But why does it take Michael Moore to tell us? This is all very dispiriting. But unless you’ve lost your sense of humor completely, you’ve just gotta laugh when Mr. Moore intercuts Mr. Bush’s tough talk from cowboy movies with actual footage of the corny cowboys in those movies saying exactly the same things.

I’ve hardly scratched the surface of this electrifying documentary. Mr. Moore even cruises through Washington reading from a loudspeaker the idiotic USA PATRIOT Act—hastily passed by Congress without ever reading it—and chronicling the lunacy it has inspired: groups and individuals harassed by cops for holding private club meetings, a woman who was refused admittance to an airplane because she was carrying breast milk. All diversionary tactics, says Mr. Moore, to distract the American people from viewing the corpses sent home from Iraq for funerals that have never once been attended by President George W. Bush, or debunking the myth of "weapons of mass destruction." People of all ages are shown voicing doubts about the kids who have died in a questionable war with no end in sight, and for what? Bush says, "Defending freedom." This movie says, "Making money." And talk about imbalance. Fact: Out of 535 members of Congress, only one has a child serving in Iraq. One of the most telling scenes in Fahrenheit 9/11 is Michael Moore, standing outside the U.S. Senate with a microphone, trying to convince members of Congress to enlist their own children for the war. Not a single Senator or Representative is willing to send his own children into harm’s way. This is one of the few scenes in which the director appears at length. One of the things that makes this movie better and more convincing than his previous films is the way Mr. Moore stays mostly in the background, compiling facts and letting the evidence speak for itself.

The Cannes cognoscenti and the limousine liberals have already declared Fahrenheit 9/11 the blockbuster documentary of the year. Who knows how it will play in Punkin Crick? I think it should be required viewing for every American, but as usual, I fear the people who could learn the most from the issues it raises will avoid it like a fund-raiser for free abortions. Mr. Moore’s opponents will label it ideologically fueled partisan agitprop, which it is, but any visionary who tries to cultivate change is destined to harvest adversaries. With his usual fury channeled and under control, Mr. Moore sets out to prick, probe and sound a wake-up call in an emotionally charged election year where the truth has been buried six feet under, and succeeds with humor and bite. The result is undeniably galvanizing, immensely watchable and damned good filmmaking. If it convinces one nonvoter to think, it will serve a purpose. The saddest and most infuriating thing I learned from Fahrenheit 9/11 is not the political hackwork, but the reality of what a lightweight the President is in the context of American history. George W. Bush may be the first President of the U.S. who has brainwashed himself.

You may reach Rex Reed via email at: rreed@observer.com.

---

See also:

The movie's website
http:/www.fahrenheit911.com

Thank You, Michael Moore (25 June 2004)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/0625041.shtml
"The light at the end of the tunnel could be the bulb in a film projector."- Jeanette Castillo (...) These towns, large and small, along with towns large and small from sea to shining sea and straight through the American heartland, will begin screening Michael Moore's documentary, 'Fahrenheit 9/11,' beginning at 12:01a.m. Friday morning, the 25th of June, 2004. For the majority of people who will see this movie, in those towns large and small, the experience will be nothing short of a mind-bomb. The Who once sang about how the hypnotized never lie, but as we have seen, people hypnotized by television and deliberately enforced fear can certainly support a war, and a President, which are fundamentally at odds with basic American decency. In fact, people hypnotized by television and deliberately enforced fear will feed themselves into the meat grinder with "God Bless America" on their lips. Michael Moore's film will snap that hypnosis, but good. Those Americans who believed what their President told them because they saw it on the TV will, after less than two hours in their local theater, look at both their television and their President with doubt and loathing when they walk from the darkness into the bright light of day. There are millions of Americans who believed what they were told - about 9/11, about Iraq, about George W. Bush himself - who will come into that bright light with the realization that they have been lied to. CLIP

Activists Using Fahrenheit 9/11 as an Organizing Tool (25 June 2004)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/0625041.shtml#1
As moviegoers come out of Fahrenheit 9/11 this weekend, anti-war activists hope to take advantage of the anger Michael's Moore's award-winning film seems likely to inspire. MoveOn.org has organized a National Interactive Town Hall Meeting for next Monday, June 28th. They have already organized over 700 house parties across the nation that night and have reserved large meeting halls for the event. MoveOn has 110,000 people pledged to see the movie this weekend, many of whom will hand out fliers promoting the Town Hall Meeting. "This movie is one of the greatest opportunities we'll have between now and November to get new folks involved," said MoveOn's Adam Ruben. "The powerful footage in this film is going to outrage many, many people. They'll be looking for ways to take action - and we'll be there to connect them to other like-minded people in their community." Voice4Change.org will have members outside theatres promoting the Town Hall Meeting and registering people to vote. Some of the activists will be in the traditional liberal hotspots. But many people in small towns around the country have either pledged to register voters or are looking for theatres near them so they can get involved. CLIP

Moore’s Magic: 9/11 Electrifies (June 25, 2004)
http://www.observer.com/pages/onthetown.asp
Michael Moore leaves no turn unstoned. There are multitudes of shattering, seminal moments in his brilliant Bush-whacking documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11, that reveal more about the cynicism, greed and ineptitude in the U.S. government than you will ever learn from any sound bite on the right-wing late-night cable-channel blabfests, but one will stay with me forever. Forget about the "official" reports from the White House about the activities of George W. Bush on the fateful morning of Sept. 11, insisting he learned about the Al Qaeda attacks while meeting with Florida pre-schoolers and quickly dashed from the room to save the country. The truth, it is now revealed, is that he was informed of the first attack on the World Trade Center before he even entered the schoolroom, and he decided to continue with his photo-op anyway. There he is on camera when Andrew Card informs him of the second plane and utters the fatal words, "We’re under attack!"—but he continues to read My Pet Goat for another seven minutes, his eyes sliding sideways in his puzzled face, like a moron looking for a bathroom, until his staff insists that he leave. (He stayed for another half hour.) If nothing else, that defining moment says volumes about what we can expect from the President of the U.S. in the center of a supreme, history-altering crisis: He’s just clueless.There are other moments that will impact some viewers and polarize others. So many, in fact, that you watch Fahrenheit 9/11 with disbelief, and leave shaking with rage. Sometimes sarcastic, always funny, Mr. Moore is armed with facts, and he presents them accurately and succinctly. The controversial filmmaker stated on the Today show that White House mouthpieces have denounced the film as "outrageously false" without seeing it, and right-wing Republicans have charged Mr. Moore with staging a "left-wing conspiracy" to influence the forthcoming election. Well, duh. For years, reactionary conservatives have been famous for staging right-wing conspiracies of their own to disgrace and discredit elected Democratic public officials. Maybe this is payback time. CLIP

Fahrenheit 9/11 Shows What's Wrong - Here's What You Can Do About It
This weekend Michael Moore's new movie, Fahrenheit 9/11, will open around the country. This documentary about what's gone wrong in Washington since 9/11 has already earned rave reviews and won the top honor at the Cannes Film Festival. This movie is so hot that Disney wouldn't let their subsidiary release it, though Disney had already paid for its distribution. Another company is finally releasing it this weekend. We are working with our friends MoveOn PAC and Michael Moore in their efforts to use the movie's release as an opportunity to organize Americans to re-defeat Bush. If it's showing in your town, please consider seeing the movie this weekend, where you'll meet other people like yourself. Then, on Monday night, we‚re planning meetings in private homes around the country to discuss what we need to do next. Each home will be connected to an online town meeting teleconference with Michael Moore.He will be discussing the film and ways for you to get directly involved in the campaign.So first, make sure you have a ticket to see the film (some shows are already sold out). You can find your nearest theater, see a trailer of the film, and buy tickets at http://www.f911tix.com/
Then, you can register to attend a house party on Monday night at: http://action.moveon.org/f911/
If you'd like to host your own party, sign up here: http://action.moveon.org/f911/newmeeting.html

Fahrenheit 9/11' ban? (June 24)
http://www.thehill.com/news/062404/moore.aspx
Ads for Moore's movie could be stopped on July 30 - Michael Moore may be prevented from advertising his controversial new movie,"Fahrenheit 9/11," on television or radio after July 30 if the FederalElection Commission (FEC) today accepts the legal advice of its generalcounsel.At the same time, a Republican-allied 527 soft-money group is preparing tofile a complaint against Moore's film with the FEC for violatingcampaign-finance law.In a draft advisory opinion placed on the FEC's agenda for today's meeting,the agency's general counsel states that political documentary filmmakersmay not air television or radio ads referring to federal candidates within30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general election. CLIP

Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 comes under right-wing attack (21 June 2004)
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jun2004/fahr-j21.shtml
US filmmaker Michael Moore’s new documentary Fahrenheit 9/11, scheduled to open in more than 500 theaters on June 25, has come under fierce attack from right-wing Republican elements. The campaign against the film, which harshly criticizes the Bush administration’s response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, is an indication of the sensitivity of the cabal in the White House to any light being shed on its activities.A Republican front group, Move Forward America, has set up a web site and urged its supporters to pressure movie theaters not to show the film. The site declares: “ ‘Bash America’ filmmaker Michael Moore is about to unleash an attack on the U.S. Military, the heroic men and women of the Armed Forces and our Commander-In-Chief via his film Fahrenheit 9/11.... The goal of the film is abundantly clear: to undermine the war on terrorism.”

Moore's images go beyond where nightly news dares take viewers (June 25)
http://pm.gazette.com/fullstory.php?id=2776
(UPI)Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" is less an expos? of George W. Bush than a dramatization of what Moore sees as a failed and dangerous presidency.The charges in the film will not come as news to those who pay attention to politics, but Moore illustrates them with dramatic images and a relentless commentary track that essentially concludes Bush is incompetent, dishonest, failing in the war on terrorism, and has bad taste in friends. Although Moore's narration ranges from outrage to sarcasm, the most devastating passage in the film speaks for itself. That's when Bush, who was reading "My Pet Goat" to a classroom of Florida children, is notified of the second attack on the World Trade Center, and yet lingers for almost seven minutes before finally leaving the room. CLIP

916 related news articles
http://news.google.com/news?num=30&hl=en&edition=us&q=cluster:www%2edfw%2ecom%2fmld%2fstartelegram%2fnews%2flocal%2f9010464%2ehtm




3.

From: "Sharon Goodwyn" sdgoodwyn@erols.com>
Subject: Texas State Democratic Party has included in its platform the Department of Peace
Date: 22 Jun 2004

Hello Jean,

Just sharin' this bit of GOOD news especially for all of those out there wondering why Dennis is still in the race. You know what? It's not over until it's over.......

"Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible."

- Unknown

Heart Blessings,

Sharon D. Goodwyn

---

From: mailto:denniskucinich@kucinich.us>Dennis Kucinich
Sent: June 22, 2004
Subject: Amazing Results from Texas

Amazing Results from Texas

Recorded by Dennis Kucinich on June 22, 2004

We've had an extraordinary weekend and I want to share what's happened. In Texas, the Texas State Democratic Party has included in its platform the Department of Peace. It was a major development brought about by the work of hundreds of our volunteers on the floor of the state convention in Texas, and it's a real credit to their work and also to the rising sentiment across this country that America MUST take a new direction - that it's no longer adequate to just approach these problems with the same mindset with which the problems were created.

That is, that we have to get out of Iraq. We have to bring our troops home. And we have to take a new direction in our society that turns away from violence as an instrument of policy, that works to make non-violence inevitable, that works to make war a thing of the past.

And so, when Texas stood up and approved the Department of Peace in the Texas State Democratic Platform it marked a milestone in our efforts. Texas has joined Oregon, Washington and Colorado in passing resolutions in favor of the Department of Peace.

And it's significant that it comes at a time when this great debate is still going on in America about the direction our Democratic party should take. You know and I know that it's been our efforts that have kept alive the debate. And you know that it's just a little more than a month to the Convention.

I want you to know that your efforts have been so important in helping us guide this entire campaign. As we move towards the Convention we're hearing from people all over the country who are expressing their appreciation for our continuing in the race.

So what I'm asking you to do is this: help us send more people to Boston. Help us to get volunteers from all across the country to participate in a week of rallies and workshops so that we can keep organizing, so that we can help our Democratic Party be strong for peace. Help us get ready for the hearings in Miami on the 9th and 10th of July.

You know, we still need to raise about $300,000 from now through the end of the Convention. And you can help us do that. So whatever you've given before, please continue to help us to complete our work here.

I'm so proud of everything that each of you has done to help make this campaign possible. And as you know my ongoing committment is steadfast. I'm there for you. I need you there for me. Please continue your efforts. As you go to the web site now, go to that part that discusses contributions, and please make a contribution. Help us continue our efforts.

I'm ready to continue to stand up and speak out, not just all the way through to the Convention, and at the Convention, but afterwards, and long into the future. But let's continue our successful efforts here.

Texas should be congratulated. Let's show our appreciation for the great work that everyone there has done. And my thanks to Oregon, Washington, Colorado and all the other states where people have strived to have the Democratic Party stand for something that is not just meaningful, but presents a broad vision of a future that can be.

So I thank you. I'm in Washington [D.C.] right now. I've got a week of activity on a number of issues. I'll be reporting to you a little bit later. But I wanted to make sure that you knew about the great success that we've had in Texas.

I want you to know that these continuing efforts are resulting in the changing direction in this country. Keep making it happen, keep helping us and keep helping America.

So thank you! Have a wonderful day, and I'll look forward to speaking with you very soon.

This is Dennis, from Washington.
Thank you so much! Bye!


Click here to contribute to Kucinich for President online

If you received this Email from a friend and would like to receive them directly, click here: http://kucinich.us/alerts-signup.htm




4.

Date: 24 Jun 2004
From: UniversalCities@care2.com
Subject: Dr. Fox was in prison for giving illegal drugs

Hi Jean ~

The interview from Rense.com of Dr. B Fox is several years old......it's amazing that it was just posted on Rense.com......

When I first saw it going around the net several years ago, I e-mailed the editor of Mt. Shasta Directions Magazine and asked her for any info that she had about Dr. Fox......

She e-mailed me back saying that the Avalon clinic had been closed for over a year, and that Dr. Fox was in prison for giving illegal drugs to some of her patients......

Adi

Universal Space Life Centers of The Mother Universe

Good People. Great Causes. Get Connected on Care2 Connect: http://www.care2.com/go/z/C2Connect

Thanks Adi for this bit of info

I had also noticed this was an old article but was not aware she had such legal problems at the end. I wonder what she is up to nowadays.

Best regards

Jean

I FORWARDED A COPY OF THIS TO SUZY WARD WHO REPLIED THE FOLLOWING:

From: "Suzy" suzy@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Dr. Fox was in prison for giving illegal drugs
Date: 25 Jun 2004

Hi dear...

If that's correct about Dr. Fox's legal problems, I'm sorry but not surprised. For several year I worked with the medical establishment in the management end for both the Army and Air Force Surgeons General and later at the American College of Physicians (the organization that represents all Internal Medicine physicians), so I know firsthand the professional jealousy and ostracism of those who step outside the traditional approaches or anyone whose "alternative therapies" threaten the establishment.

I've heard about people who have encountered these blackballing or legal sanctions. It's been speculated that the powers at the pharmaceutical companies control the FDA and the organizations that govern medical practice. Our government's current attempts to prohibit us from buying drugs in Canada or elsewhere at far lower prices than here and the new drug provision in Medicare are outrageous. Also the effort to label vitamins and dietary supplements as drugs is designed to further solidify this power group's control over our choices, so it seems pretty conclusive that the speculation is well founded.

Love, Suzy

LATER ON, ADI ALSO MENTIONED THIS...

I should also add that the DNA 'research' that she reported on at the Mexico conference has never been seen or reproduced by anyone anywhere and is generally considered to be bogus, and that she is considered to have been taking advantage of the new agers who were looking for such developments based on various channellings for her own self-agrandisement.

And I should point out that the channellings about increasing of DNA to 12 strands is only a metaphor for the ascension of the Soul and Its human body ~ which becomes perfectly united with the Light Body ~ and that the channellings about returning to the original 12 strand DNA are also metaphorical, meaning the return to the original Higher Light Body of Soul/Spirit ~ no physical evidence exists that there ever was any 12 strand DNA anywhere at anytime.

You may know that there is a recent book which explains that all of this new age focus on DNA is in fact just a metaphor for the Soul ~ and perhaps I should also add that channellings about the DNA evolving into a crystalline molecule are also only metaphorical in the above sense of ascension into the perfection of Light Body, etc. ~

From a purely biochemical standpoint it is ludicrous.

Ascension includes Universal Mind & Intelligence as well as Universal Love & Wisdom.

Blessings for you and your great Service to us all!

Adi

NOTE FROM JEAN: I also sought Suzy's comment on this further viewpoint and here is her reply (in part):

On the suggestion by Adi that "that there ever was any 12 strand DNA anywhere at anytime"...

S: No records or physical evidence exist because these civilizations lived millennia prior to anything now known on Earth.

And on this: "You may know that there is a recent book which explains that all of this new age focus on DNA is in fact just a metaphor for the Soul"...

S: I'm not aware of this book, but are one person's interpretations really a sound basis for believing that physical changes due to light absorption are only metaphorical for spiritual enlightenment? It's hard to imagine what that author's agenda is.

As far back as January 1997, Matthew (then speaking within a group mind) has spoken about the physical changes that the additional light is effecting. You know that I rarely read other channel's material, but a number of the messages I have read (usually because they are forwarded with a request for M's take on a specific aspect of the information) also state that actual physical changes are taking place in light receptive people. I've seen several reports about the DNA differences in Indigo and Crystal children and even in some adults, but I've deleted them after reading. It makes sense that if we're designed physiologically to live in third density, our surviving physically in higher vibrations requires adjustments, doesn't it?




5.

THE NDP WILL GET MY VOTE ON MONDAY

Date: 25 Jun 2004
From: NewsLetter@ceasefire.ca
Subject: Canadian elections - Grading the Parties On Defence

The parties have handed in their homework, and now it's time to grade their proposals for Canada's defence policy.

GRADE NAME SUMMARY

A New Democratic The New Democrats are the most likely to Partyestablish an independent and peacekeeping defence policy for Canada.

B+ Bloc Québécois The Bloc Québécois' defence policy will use a common-sense approach that builds upon the traditional pacifist sentiment in Quebec.

B Green Party The Green Party seeks a rapid response force of ìeco-warriors.î

C Liberal Party Liberals will build up the military to satisfy Americans, while promising Canadians that the battle tanks and smart bombs will only be used for “peacekeeping.”

D Conservative PartyConservatives will build up the Canadian Forces so they are better suited to help the U.S.-led War on Terrorism.

Many Canadians had hoped that this election would focus on Canada's role in the world, especially since Canada seems to be caught between our traditional role as diplomat and peacekeeper and the bellicose worldview espoused by the United States government.

Unfortunately the issue of defence spending largely overtook the more important discussion of defence and foreign policies. This election, voters were treated to an ìarms raceî of military spending promises and creative fictions from party leaders about support for the war on Iraq and the weaponization of space.

But through all of the chatter of sound bites and kilometres of newspaper columns and mounds of campaign brochures, some distinctly different visions of Canada's role in the world have begun to emerge for consideration by voters.

The Polaris Institute studies Canadian security policies and advocates a public-interest viewpoint on these issues.

Using party platforms, statements by party leaders and candidates, media coverage, and previous performance in Parliament, the Polaris Institute has sharpened its red pencil and produced the parties' end-of-campaign report card.

You can read the full report at http://www.ceasefire.ca.

Sincerely yours,

Steven Staples

---

Other Parties

Unfortunately we were not able to review all of the parties' platforms, but useful summaries have been compiled by several media outlets:

Globe and Mail, Decision 2004 http://www.globeandmail.com/special/federalelection/Decision2004.html
issues

Canada.com, Decision Canada
http://www.canada.com/national/features/decisioncanada/issues.html

CBC, Canada Votes
http://www.cbc.ca/canadavotes/leadersparties/parties/platforms.html

CTV, Election 2004
http://www.ctv.ca/mini/election2004/static/issues/issues.html

For a complete list of all of the political parties and their web sites, visit Elections Canada's list of registered parties at http://www.elections.ca.

Donations and inquiries may be directed to: Polaris Institute / Attn. Carole Pharand, Administrator 312 Cooper Street / Ottawa ONK2P 0G7 tel. 613 237-1717 / fax. 613 237-3359 polarisinstitute@on.aibn.com /NewsLetter@ceasefire.ca http://www.ceasefire.ca/
http://www.polarisinstitute.org


Steven Staples is the Director of the Polaris Institute's Project on the Corporate-Security State.




6.

Date: 24 Jun 2004
From: Connie Fogal conniefogal@telus.net>
Subject: The Truth on Harper & His Conservative Party

Here are some facts that you need to know before making an informed decision on June 28th

1. Stephen Harper was the only Canadian Parliamentarian invited and who attended the Bilderberger Meeting last year in Versailles France.

2. Stephen Harper returned to Canada and went public with his plan to merge the Alliance & Conservative parties against the members wishes

3. To date no convention or meeting of members of this newly formed party has ever been held to agree on party policy and platform.

4. Stephen Harper released his platform in Ontario which calls for a European style union between Canada and the United States

5. Stephen Harper's platform parallels the platform of Canada's largest CEO's which calls for "deep integration" in the USA

6. Stephen Harper presented an Alliance Motion in Parliament to support George Bush's war in Iraq. Thankfully he was defeated

7. Stephen Harper completely supports Canada joining the US National Missile Defence System

8. Stephen Harper wants to privatize our industries, health care and resources

9. As President of the National Citizens Coalition, Harper promoted private two tier health care

10. Harper is touring Ontario and the Eastern Provinces with Brian Mulroney who sold Canada out through the Free Trade and NAFTA

11. Mulroney sits on the International Advisory Board for the US Council on Foreign Relations

12. Belinda Stronach sits on the Board of Directors of the US Chamber of Commerce

13. Harper wants to make an American Ambassador a Canadian Secretary of State

14. Harper promises scrapping the gun registry only, not Bill C68. He already knows the information on Canada's gun registry has been already shared with the United States NSA.

15. Harper supported the contract to Lockheed Martin the US's largest defence contractor to carry out Canada's 2006 Census.




7.

From: http://www.tompaine.com/articles/will_the_commissioners_cave.php

Will The Commissioners Cave?

by Ray McGovern

June 21, 2004

Amid the feeding frenzy over last week’s staff report of the 9/11 commission, the press downplayed an important fact: the report was produced by the staff and not the commissioners themselves. This matters greatly as we approach the July 26 deadline for the commission’s final report. The Democratic commissioners are saying the staff report reflects the commission’s findings, while the Republican commissioners disagree. McGovern, a former CIA analyst, explains the partisan wrangling we can expect during the next month.

Ray McGovern, a CIA analyst for 27 years, is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.

Will the Sept. 11 Commission follow the example set by Congress and the Intelligence Community and let itself be intimidated by Vice President Dick Cheney?

Now that the commission’s staff report has pulled the rug out from under the notion so successfully fostered by the administration that Iraq played a role in the attacks of 9/11, no one should be surprised if the commissioners pull the rug out from under the staff. There are disquieting signs that this has already begun to happen.

The stakes could not be higher for the president and vice president. Arguably, the commission is in position to play in 2004 a role analogous to that played by the Supreme Court in 2000 in ensuring the election of George W. Bush and Cheney. This, I believe, accounts for the dyspeptic reaction of the two to the staff report and the press play accorded it last week.

New York Times pundit William Safire is also outraged. In his column today he lashes out at the commission chairman, Republican Tom Kean, and the vice chairman, Democrat Lee Hamilton, for letting themselves be “jerked around by a manipulative staff.” Safire drives home the point that the staff conclusion concerning Iraq and 9/11 was “not a judgment of the panel of commissioners,” but rather “an interim report of the commission’s runaway staff.”

Republican Commissioners Fall Into Line

Appearing Sunday on ABC’s This Week, Sept. 11 commission chairman Kean fell in line, saying repeatedly that the staff report is only an “interim report.” Not only did he note it is “not finished,” the commissioners themselves have not been involved in it so far and the final report will include whatever “new information” becomes available.

It is not hard to see what is coming. On Thursday Cheney told the press that he “probably” had more intelligence information than had been made available to the commission. Commissioner John Lehman, another Republican stalwart, told Meet the Press Sunday “the vice president was right when he said that he may have things that we don’t have. And we are now in the process of getting the latest intelligence.”

Flash back, if you dare, to other “intelligence” promoted by Cheney: the aluminum tubes that turned out not to be suitable for fashioning nuclear materials after all; the mobile “biological warfare labs” that produced nothing more lethal than hydrogen for weather balloons; the infamous report, based on forged documents, alleging that Iraq was seeking uranium in Africa.

CLIP




8.

From: http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/the_draft_is_coming_back.html

Sent: June 20, 2004
Subject: Starting in June 2005, the draft is coming back 
From: Billy-Joe Mauldin wildbill2@aeneas.net>

Greetings, gentlemen. This is some bad news which applies to us all. In one year, starting in June 2005, the draft is coming back, only this is the draft on steroids. This is not the draft that was being protested 35 years ago. There will be no college deferment, no conscience-objector status, women will be drafted, and there will be no going to Canada; 2 years ago, the Canadian Gov't. signed a deal with the administration- in the event of the reinstatement of the American draft, Canada would provide no haven for draft resistors. So, as I'm listening to this on the radio last night, I'm thinking, "Gee, am I glad I'm 42!". Then the other shoe fell, and heads-up, Doc, Jeff & Eddie, this is why I'm sending this to you: The draft will apply to everyone between the ages of 18 and 49! This is going to be a model of the Israeli system, and there are presently tens of thousands of Israelis who refuse to serve and are in prison as a result. Eddie, this applies to you, sir: Professional people over the age of 26 are likely to be put into the military for their professional skills. Lest anyone think this is incorrect rumour-mongering, please check out 2 websites: http://www.nodraft.info &http://www.infowars.com. Also, legislation has been introduced, "The Universal National Service Act of 2003". It is S89 in the Senate http://tinyurl.com/3ybhz and HR163 in the House. People who are not put into the military will be required to perform 20 to 30 hours of work per week in their neighborhoods and towns on behalf of the Dept. of Homeland Security. (Doc and Joe Citizen: hey, guys, here come the brownshirts! ) These hopped-up neighborhood watch groups will be the gestapo tattle-tale squads we've been expecting for years. I hate to send bad news to anyone, but some things we need to know. Again, go to nodraft.info and infowars.com, check it out, get educated and stay aware. Everybody be cool!




9.

IN AN IDEAL WORLD THIS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN. EXCELLENT!

From: Mike Nickerson sustain@web.ca>
Date: 24 Jun 2004
Subject: A New Role for Governance

A New Role for Governance

Why would anyone bother to start a new political party? It's no small task, to connect with people across a country, define common cause and then attempt to breach the well guarded access to public communications.

The motivation behind the Green Party's emergence is compelling. Since industrialization began, society has focused on building productive machinery, hooking it up to energy sources and cranking out ever expanding volumes of material goods. Until now, politicians of all stripes have made their careers by promising ever greater volumes of gross product for their electors.

The continuous expansion of the industrial process has brought about a fundamental change in our relationship with the Earth.

When industrialization began, people numbered a few hundred million. Today there are over six thousand million of us. Furthermore, each of us today, on average, consume a far greater volume of natural resources and produce a correspondingly greater amount of waste. In the last fifty years, our waste has increasingly contained dangerous manufactured chemicals. The change in human impact is huge.

At a time when human activity is disrupting everything from the diversity of life forms to the global climate, what sense is there in continuing to accelerate expansion?

Rather than disperse what remains of the natural world for political and economic gain, effective government should be reorganizing the system to encourage non-destructive practices. The need for change is doubly obvious when we see decisions being made on the blind assumption that expanding the flow of money (GDP) will increase well-being. This is what globalization is about. It inflates GDP, but that money has little to do with the well-being of most people. What use is the GDP measure when it sees no difference between money spent cleaning up disasters brought on by our waste and money spent educating the next generation. Indeed, education, along with health care are often sacrificed to feed the "needs" of capital growth.

Green governance would start with a Genuine Progress Index (GPI). In addition to the traditional measurements of economic performance: GDP and rates of employment, a GPI would measure job satisfaction and dependency of foreign investment. It would also measure the value of unpaid work in homes and communities, resource stocks, pollution levels, the durability of goods, the nutritional quality of food, levels of education, public participation in decision making, rates of crime, signs of equity and inequity and other factors which Canadians feel indicate improvements in, or deterioration of their well-being.

A Green government would follow by lowering taxes on employment and would replace the diminished revenue with taxes on resource drawdown and pollution. Phased in over a number of years, this would have the effect of making it less expensive to employ people and more expensive to waste resources and pollute. In the meantime, public resources would be allocated in ways to encourage renewable energy, conservation, pollution reduction, local employment, preventative health care, participatory democracy and education.

While consumption and waste have to be managed within limits, education and preventative health care offer unlimited opportunities for improving well-being. These public services are based primarily on good will, sharing of information and caring for each other. The obsolescence of the old political priorities is revealed when these activities are discounted because they do not make the economy grow.

What is life for? Are we born to shop until we drop? Or would we actually derive more satisfaction from clean air and water, quality food and time to spend with friends. Genuine progress is progress which leaves the world intact for the generations that follow.

If your vote counted, would you vote for the Party that offers to lead Canada toward a healthy relationship with the land and life? Take the leap of faith and the Green Party will take steps to establish proportional representation (PR). PR means that the seats in Parliament would be filled in proportions matching the votes cast. Majority power could no longer be exercised without a majority of votes. Your vote could be used to express how you feel the country should be run rather than as a weapon to deter unsavory parties and politicians. Parliament would become a place for debating issues from different perspectives, rather than a setting for opportunism and categorical opposition.

Consider the possibilities.

http://www.SustainWellBeing.net/GreenParty/challenge-and-goal.html

- 30 -

Mike Nickerson
2799 McDonald's Corners Rd.
RR #3 Lanark, Ontario K0G 1K0
phone:(613) 259-9988
sustain@web.ca

* - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - *

"There is only one power available to citizens which does not require great wealth or the use of violence. It is the power of collective persuasion. It works on the subtle levels of thought and conversation and it works directly through democracy."

http://www.SustainWellBeing.net




SUBSCRIPTION TO THE EARTH RAINBOW NETWORK E-LIST

If you would like to subscribe to the Earth Rainbow Network automated listserver and regularly receive similar compilations covering a broad range of subjects, including each new Meditation Focus issued every two week, simply send a blank email at earthrainbownetwork-subscribe@lists.riseup.net from the email account to which you want to receive the material compiled and networked by the Earth Rainbow Network Coordinator. Subscription is FREE!





BACK TO THE FIRST HOME PAGE OF THIS SITE